# Beyond clicks, what interaction data should we actually be sending in to get meaningfully better recommendations? | FAQ

> Source: https://www.recombee.com/faq/what-interaction-data-should-we-send

> For the complete site index, see [llms.txt](/llms.txt). To integrate Recombee, see the developer documentation at https://docs.recombee.com/llms.txt.

# [FAQ](https://www.recombee.com/faq)

[All->](https://www.recombee.com/faq)
[How It Works->](https://www.recombee.com/faq/how-it-works)
[Recommendations->](https://www.recombee.com/faq/recommendations)
[Personalized Search->](https://www.recombee.com/faq/personalized-search)
[Features->](https://www.recombee.com/faq/features)

[FAQ](https://www.recombee.com/faq)

[<- Back to List](https://www.recombee.com/faq)

# Beyond clicks, what interaction data should we actually be sending in to get meaningfully better recommendations?

Click data alone is a weak signal - partial consumption data is significantly more informative. Tracking what fraction of content a user actually consumed - the percentage of a video watched, the portion of an article read, the segment of a song played - gives the system a direct measure of satisfaction rather than intent alone. A click followed by immediate exit carries very different meaning from a click followed by full consumption. Sending engagement depth signals allows the recommender to distinguish genuine interest from accidental or disappointed clicks.

[How It Works](https://www.recombee.com/faq/how-it-works)

Haven’t Found The Information You Are Looking For?

## Recommended Topics for You